When APIs Break the AI Agent Model — and How to Adapt
- Chris Ruddick
- 23 hours ago
- 3 min read
Updated: 3 hours ago
Agentic AI has opened new doors for automation in logistics. But many organizations are discovering an inconvenient truth: most logistics APIs were never designed to be used by an AI agent.
From deeply nested data structures to inconsistent parameter naming, legacy and 3rd-party APIs can pose significant challenges to agent adoption.
In this article, we break down the core incompatibilities between typical logistics APIs and agentic AI, and how to adapt your systems to overcome them.

Why Agents Struggle with Logistics APIs
1. Too Many Parameters
Many shipping APIs have 50-200+ parameters required for a single call. Some are conditional or interdependent:
Accessorial codes based on freight class
Time windows, hazmat flags, equipment types
Nested contact info, addresses, package specs
LLMs cannot reliably generate deeply structured JSON without strict constraints. The chance of missing or hallucinating a key field grows quickly.
2. Nested or Inconsistent Schema Design
APIs often include deeply nested structures like:
JSON
{
  "shipment": {
    "origin": {
      "address": { "line1": "..." }
    }
  }
}
Agents do better with flat, consistently named fields. Even minor schema inconsistencies (e.g. zipCode vs postal_code) introduce failure risk.
3. Lack of Metadata
APIs rarely include usable descriptions of parameters. Without documentation or examples, agents cannot infer what values are expected.
4. Unvalidated Input
Agents may generate values that look plausible but are invalid (e.g. incorrect date formats, misspelled service levels). Without input validation, these issues cause silent failures.
5. No Dry-Run or Validation Mode
Many APIs do not support a dry-run flag to test a call without executing it. This makes agent experimentation risky in production.
How to Adapt APIs for Agentic Use
1. Wrap Complex APIs in Simplified Tool Interfaces
Create internal Lambda functions or microservices that:
Flatten the input structure
Hide conditional logic
Translate human-friendly options into API codes
This is much easier for agents to reason about than full booking schemas.
2. Use JSON Schema or OpenAPI Descriptions
Give agents structured metadata:
Describe each parameter with examples
Define allowed types and enums
Set required vs optional fields
This helps agents auto-complete tool inputs correctly.
3. Add a Validation Mode
Before committing to a real booking, allow a "validation only" mode that checks inputs and returns errors without executing side effects. This is crucial for safe agent experimentation.
4. Normalize Field Names and Data Models
Standardize naming across tools:
origin_zip, not origZip, OriginZip, zipFrom
Use consistent units (e.g. lbs, inches, USD)
Agents struggle when the same concept is expressed differently across systems.
5. Log and Inspect Tool Failures
Agents need observability:
Log all input/output
Flag unexpected tool results
Use retries or fallbacks when necessary
How Our Platform Helps
We know logistics APIs can be inconsistent, overloaded, and hard to work with. That’s why our platform:
Provides pre-built wrappers for carrier and TMS APIs
Supports flat tool interfaces with descriptions
Handles data mapping and transformation for agent-facing tasks
As agentic AI adoption grows, we offer the infrastructure to safely expose even legacy systems to intelligent automation.
Conclusion
Agentic AI can be powerful, but only if the tools it uses are understandable and reliable. Many logistics APIs were built for engineers, not AI.
By wrapping and adapting these APIs with simpler, normalized, and documented interfaces, you can unlock agent compatibility without rewriting your stack.
Ready to Make Your APIs Agent-Ready?
Book a call to review your logistics APIs
Explore our low-code automation platform
Subscribe to our Agentic AI in Logistics series