top of page

Workflow Orchestration vs. Agentic AI in Logistics: Making the Right Choice

As artificial intelligence gains traction in the logistics industry, many supply chain leaders are asking: What is the difference between traditional automation and agent-based AI? More importantly, when should you use one over the other?


In this article, we'll explore the distinction between workflow orchestration (deterministic automation) and agentic AI (autonomous, adaptive systems), helping you understand when each approach is best suited for your logistics operation.


At Splice we provide workflow automation purpose-built for the logistics industry — similar to Zapier, but tailored to shipping, freight, and supply chain integrations. We do not currently offer agentic AI, in part due the lack of suitable data required to power the models. Instead, we’re actively educating the market on where it fits, where it doesn’t, and how it complements existing tools like ours.


Workflow orchestration and Agentic AI: A hybrid approach is the future
Orchestration is about reliability and structure whereas agentic AI is about flexibility and autonomy

What Is Workflow Orchestration?


Workflow orchestration refers to predefined, rules-based automation. In logistics, this often means connecting systems via event triggers:

Example: "When a shipment is created in the TMS, send a confirmation email and update the ERP."


Orchestrated workflows follow clear logic:

  • If A happens, do B

  • If B fails, alert someone


These systems are predictable, transparent, and highly reliable. They're ideal for structured processes like:


  • Booking confirmation

  • Status updates

  • Document generation

  • API-to-API data syncing


Platforms like Splice excel at this. With no-code tooling, teams can automate hundreds of repetitive tasks without writing code.


What Is Agentic AI?


Agentic AI is a newer paradigm, powered by large language models (LLMs) like OpenAI's GPT-4. These systems can:


  • Understand goals in natural language

  • Choose tools based on context

  • Plan actions and reason about the next best step


Instead of being explicitly told what to do, agents can interpret vague instructions like:


"Find the cheapest way to get this pallet to Hamburg."


Then:

  • Search multiple carrier APIs

  • Compare rates and transit times

  • Make a booking or ask for clarification


Agents operate more like digital employees than process pipelines. They're ideal for messy, complex, or exception-heavy tasks.


Side-by-Side Comparison of Workflow Orchestration and Agentic AI

Feature

Workflow Orchestration

Agentic AI

Logic Type

Deterministic

Adaptive, goal-based

Setup

Trigger-action rules

Prompt and context driven

Error Handling

Defined fallbacks

Dynamic replanning

Tool Usage

Prewired steps

Chosen at runtime

Input Type

Structured events

Natural language, unstructured data

Transparency

Fully auditable

Some black-box behavior

Best For

Repetitive, structured tasks

Dynamic, edge-case-heavy workflows


Choosing the Right Tool for the Job


Use Workflow Orchestration When:


  • You have stable, well-defined business logic

  • Accuracy and compliance are essential

  • You want full auditability and control

  • Tasks involve integrating known systems (TMS, ERP, carrier portals)


Use Agentic AI When:


  • Human reasoning is currently required

  • Inputs are vague (emails, PDFs, messy disorganized portals)

  • The process changes often or isn't fully defined

  • Exceptions dominate the workload (requotes, reroutes, delays)


Hybrid Is the Future

Most organizations won't choose just one. Instead, they'll use agents to assist or trigger orchestrated workflows:


Agent receives an email with a shipping request → parses it → triggers a booking workflow → monitors the outcome → follows up if needed


This hybrid model offers both reliability and flexibility.


Why Splice Focuses on Orchestration First


While agentic AI is exciting, it's not yet ready to replace deterministic logic for critical operations like:


  • Booking freight with specific compliance rules

  • Customs document submission

  • Billing and financial integrations


Why isn’t agentic AI a viable replacement for workflow orchestration?


For one, agentic AI requires accurate, structured, and accessible data to make sound decisions. Many organizations still struggle with siloed, outdated, or low-quality data, which can cause the AI to "hallucinate" or make incorrect judgments, leading to costly mistakes and compliance risks. Technical issues can be compounded by cultural resistance to AI and skill gaps to provide oversight of the AI. 


Our platform helps logistics teams eliminate manual work safely, scalably, and transparently. We prioritize:


  • API integrations with carriers, brokers, and ERPs

  • Event-driven workflows for speed and reliability

  • Human-in-the-loop steps when needed


We believe agentic AI will be a powerful companion to these systems — but not a replacement.


The Upshot


Agentic AI and workflow orchestration serve different, complementary purposes in logistics:


  • Orchestration is about reliability and structure

  • Agentic AI is about flexibility and autonomy


Choosing the right one depends on the problem you're trying to solve. As the technology matures, forward-thinking logistics companies will combine both.


Ready to Automate Smarter?


bottom of page